[Open] Science Sunday – 1-11-09
Random samples of my reading list brought to you through the magic of the internet, bloggers and Open Access.
This has been a busy week, but I managed to get some reading in anyway.
I loved this article in PLoS Computational Biology (Getting Started in Gene Expression Microarray Analysis) by Slonim and Yanai. It is a great “do’s and don’t’s” of the technique. I love articles that spell out techniques I don’t have personal experience with, because they give me the information I need to be able to make a critical assessment of the literature that make use of them. I will be coming back to this article a lot!
Steve Wilbanks has a great post: “Open Source Science? Or distributed science?” He starts his blog by saying:
I was asked in an interview recently about “open source science” and it got me thinking about the ways that, in the “open” communities of practice, we frequently over-simplify the realities of how software like GNU/Linux actually came to be. Open Source refers to a software worldview. It’s about software development, not a universal truth that can be easily exported. And it’s well worth unpacking the worldview to understand it, and then to look at the realities of open source software as they map – or more frequently do not map – to science.
And that was enough to hook me. Very interesting read.
Misha (from Mind Hacks) has a great post on brain stories and neuronovels, or about how neuroscience is seeping into literature. The post is a comment on a story by Marco Roth (n+1) which is a must read for those that love both literature and the brain.
My favourite tweet this week is by @gnat, pointing to the historical thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. Lust, indeed!